Sturgeon Bay's Historic Michigan Street Bridge gets a new two-lane companion bridge.
Aug 7, 2008 Sturgeon Bay -- A new two-lane bridge, scheduled to open Sunday, September 21, 2008, will complete a four-lane Federal Highway safety requirement for Door County's Northern Corridor. Addressing major safety and sufficiency concerns, the Sturgeon Bay four-lane bridge project (Business Hwy 42/57) is a giant step closer to completion with the opening of a companion two-lane bridge just a little over 700 feet away from the historic two-lane Michigan Street bridge. The building of this two-lane companion bridge saved numerous downtown structures from the wrecking ball, including the historic bridge, which was recently listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It avoided a two-year closure to the historic downtown district and provided continued access to County Trunk B running to Egg Harbor. It will save the historic commercial district from annual shutdowns, offer county drivers an adequate alternate route to the highway, and secure the mainland access to Door County's only hospital. The new bridge was born out of six years of review and negotiations between the Wisconsin DOT, the Federal Advisory Council for Historic Preservation (ACHP), State Historic Preservation Officer, National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP), City of Sturgeon Bay, and other local organizations through Sec.106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and Section 4(f) processes which are required when seeking federal dollars for state road projects that effect historic properties.The processes identify options and possible adverse effects on historic properties. An all-day county-wide inaugural celebration, originally planned for August 23, 2008, the day the State will take ownership from the builders, was delayed until Sept. 21 by the WisDOT.
History Offers A Green Solution
With concerns about reducing our use of natural resources and the movement toward green construction practices, Wisconsin leads the nation with this creative four-lane solution that 's been ten years in the making. Over the last four decades, state and federal funding processes resulted in countless replacement projects where bridges could have been maintained and preserved with proper funding. This tear-down mindset was rejected by the consulting parties in the Programmatic Agreement (PA) process conducted by the WisDOT, ACHP, NTHP, and SHPO who came together with others to form the visionary 4 lane solution. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, federal and state representatives, the City of Sturgeon Bay and Door County board worked with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and federal agencies to address the problem without losing one structure, and without suffering needless downtime. Millions of dollars were saved by lowering overall construction costs to the proposed 4 lane inplace replacement. This project prevented tons of material from being deposited in landfills and used much less cement and steel in the new bridge construction. The carbon footprint was dramatically reduced by simply opting to repair the existing two-lanes and adding only two more new lanes to address the insufficiencies and safety concerns within this area. Citizens for Our Bridge is in the process of working with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) firm, 360 GREEN INC, Josh Arnold, principle, who will work with others to compute the environmental and economic savings achieved within this project. His final report can be useful to other states and communities intent on reducing their costs and carbon footprints when considering similar historic projects. State projects take environmental and economic issues seriously today and we believe our state and this project are leading the country by example. For a copy of our mission statement and financial information please see steelbridgesongfest.org or call 920-495-3779.
Note: Sturgeon Bay Bridges(Michigan Street) was offficially placed on the National Register of Historic Places January 2008 as is recognized for its substantial engineering and design. It is also the most prominant, nationally significant Veterans War Memorial in Door County, dedicated July 4 1931, as a thank you to all in Door County who served in times of need.
History and Background:
#1. ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION Case Digest spring 2006 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Case Digest-Washington DC ABOUT THIS REPORT For full report: www.achp.gov/docs/case_spring06.pdf
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to consider historic preservation values when planning their activities. In the Section 106 process, a Federal agency must identify affected historic properties, evaluate the proposed action's effects, and then explore ways to avoid or mitigate those effects. The Federal agency often conducts this process with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), State Historic Preservation Officers, representatives of Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations, and other parties with an interest in the issues. Sometimes a Programmatic Agreement (PA) or a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is reached and signed by the project's consulting parties. A PA clarifies roles, responsibilities, and expectations of all parties engaged in large and complex Federal projects that may have an effect on a historic property. An MOA specifies the mitigation measure that the lead Federal agency must take to ensure the protection of a property's historic values. Each year thousands of Federal actions undergo Section 106 review. The vast majority of cases are routine and resolved at the State or tribal level, without the ACHP's involvement. A considerable number of cases, however, present issues or challenges that warrant the ACHP's attention. The criteria for ACHP involvement in reviewing Section 106 cases are set forth in Appendix A of the ACHP's regulations. In accordance with those criteria, the ACHP is likely to enter the Section 106 process when an undertaking: • has substantial impacts on important historic properties; • presents important questions of policy or interpretation; • has the potential for presenting procedural problems; and/or • presents issues of concern to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. This report presents a representative cross-section of undertakings that illustrate the variety and complexity of Federal activities in which the ACHP is currently involved. It illustrates the ways the Federal Government influences what happens to historic properties in communities throughout the Nation, and highlights the importance of informed citizens to be alert to potential conflicts between Federal actions and historic preservation goals, and the necessity of public participation to achieve the best possible preservation solution. In addition to this report, at www.achp.gov/casedigest.html, the ACHP's Web site contains a useful library of information about the ACHP, Section 106 review, and the national historic preservation program.
Wisconsin (Update) June 6, 2002 Project: Completed Case: Sturgeon Bay Bridge Rehabilitation Agency: Federal Highway Administration Contact: Carol Legard clegard@achp.gov On January 9, 2006, the ACHP, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the rehabilitation of the historic Michigan Street Bridge, and construction of a new bridge two blocks distant from the existing bridge, that together will carry four lanes of traffic across Sturgeon Bay and the Sturgeon Bay Shipping Canal. The agreement culminated six years of consultation to resolve adverse effects of the proposed project on the bridge and the attached operator's house. The result was the preservation of a 75-year-old, multi-span Warren/Parker truss bridge that was in grave danger of demolition and replacement by a contemporary structure. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Case Digest spring 2006 Sturgeon Bay is a major Great Lakes shipping port in scenic Door County that accommodates the largest ships on the Great Lakes. The Michigan Street Bridge connects the city's central business district while carrying vehicular traffic over shipping lanes. On January 9, 2006, an MOA was completed for the rehabilitation of Michigan Street Bridge and construction of a new bridge crossing from Maple Street to Oregon Street over the Ship Canal in the City of Sturgeon Bay. This was the culmination of a process that formally began in 1999, when FHWA initiated Section 106 consultation on a proposal to demolish and replace the historic Michigan Street Bridge in the City of Sturgeon Bay. The current proposal for two two-lane bridges will preserve the historic bridge for another 25 years, and will provide the community with greater mobility and reliability than the original proposal that would have destroyed the historic bridge. The Michigan Street Bridge is a 75-year-old, multispan Warren/Parker truss bridge with a double leaf rolling lift span. The 1,413-foot-long, two-lane bridge was built in 1930. The structure was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 1986 but has not been listed.(listed January 2008) Because it was considered structurally and functionally deficient it was originally not considered a viable candidate for preservation. A 1997 Programmatic Agreement (PA) among the FHWA, ACHP, and Wisconsin SHPO for bridges in the State identified the Michigan Street Bridge as one that did not warrant preservation. Subsequently, a local citizens's group, National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP), and the ACHP asked FHWA to reconsider this position in light of repairs made to the structure in the mid-1990s. Section 4(f ) requires DOT agencies to demonstrate there is no feasible and prudent alternative to removing a historic property. The NTHP also retained a bridge expert to conduct an assessment of the feasibility and costs of rehabilitation. Strong local advocacy to preserve the historic bridge, armed with this additional information, led the WisDOT to reconsider. It selected a new preferred alternative that will retain the historic bridge (with rehabilitation) and construct a new two-lane lift bridge two blocks from the existing bridge. The governor of Wisconsin committed $30 million to fund the new bridge, which will be completed before the Michigan Street Bridge rehabilitation begins. The Third Avenue Downtown Historic District, located at the eastern terminus of the bridge, is listed in the NRHP. The parties agreed that rehabilitation of the existing bridge will not have an adverse effect on the district. Retention of the bridge that connects historic core elements of Sturgeon Bay will continue to contribute to an authentic heritage experience for residents and visitors. While the lead federal agency is FHWA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Coast Guard must also issue approvals or permits for the undertaking and they participated in consultation and execution of the MOA. Additional consulting parties included the Wisconsin SHPO, WisDOT, City of Sturgeon Bay, Citizens for Our Bridge Committee, Citizens for the Future of Sturgeon Bay, Door County Maritime Museum, and the NTHP. The MOA documents the agreement reached among the many consulting parties to rehabilitate and continue to use the existing historic bridge along with a new two-lane bridge built nearby. The MOA requires rehabilitation of the historic bridge to be completed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines; retains the existing operator's house on the Michigan Street Bridge and stipulates preparation of plans for its long-term maintenance; and provides the SHPO and other consulting parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary design of the project. The MOA also contains specific stipulations addressing archeological resources that may be discovered in areas impacted by bridge construction and rehabilitation. Sturgeon Bay Bridge (Photo: the National Trust for Historic Preservation)
#2 National Trust for Historic Preservation- Washington DC Section 4(f) Case Study: Michigan Street Bridge, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
November 1, 2005 http://www.preservation.org/resources/case-studies/transportation/sectio...
When open, the Michigan Street Bridge is a striking sight: the two arms of its center span point to the sky, leaving the channel clear for passing boats. Without Section 4(f), however, that scene would have sunk into the past. Built in 1930, the Michigan Street Bridge quickly became a community icon. Not only do its two lanes carry heavy vehicle traffic, but during the summer, this rolling lift bridge opens almost hourly to allow boat traffic through the canal that connects Lake Michigan and Green Bay. In 1970s, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation proposed demolishing this landmark and replacing it with a four-lane bridge. The initial review of this plan, undertaken under Section 106 of the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act, did not protect the Michigan Street Bridge, and so the federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation authorized its demolition. The National Trust responded by using Section 4(f) to advocate keeping the bridge. Without going to court, the Trust put pressure on the state and federal transportation agencies and brought in historic bridge expert Abba Lichtenstein to convince local and state officials that the structure was sound. After several years of re-evaluation, the Wisconsin DOT decided to change its plans: it has made a commitment to rehabilitate the Michigan Street Bridge and to build an additional two-lane bridge nearby. Local officials welcomed this plan, which would not have emerged without Section 4(f).